Showing posts with label processed foods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label processed foods. Show all posts

Saturday, 10 January 2026

Some Food Preservatives Linked To Higher Cancer and Diabetes Risk

From barrons.com/news

By AFP - Agence France Presse

Eating some common food preservatives is linked to a slightly higher risk of eventually developing cancer and diabetes, according to two large French studies published Thursday.

However, outside experts called for more research and emphasised that these kinds of observational studies cannot demonstrate a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

The first study, published in the journal BMJ, said it observed "multiple associations between preservatives that are widely used in industrial foods and beverages on the European market... and higher incidences of overall, breast and prostate cancers".

The preservatives included nitrites and nitrates, which are often used to cure ham, bacon and sausages.

The second study, published in Nature Communications, also found a link between eating some food additives and developing type 2 diabetes.

Both studies were based on an ongoing research project in which more than 100,000 French people fill out regular questionnaires about their diet.

French epidemiologist Mathilde Touvier, who supervised both studies, told AFP that "consuming products with preservatives does not mean you will immediately develop cancer".

"But we need to limit how much we are exposed to these products," she said.

"The message for the general public is to choose the least processed foods when shopping in the supermarket."

The strongest link found in the first study was between sodium nitrite and prostate cancer, which increased the risk by around a third.

However, the level of increased risk remained moderate. For comparison, heavy smoking raises the risk of getting lung cancer by more than 15 times.

Potassium sorbate, which is commonly used to stop mould and bacteria from growing in food and drink, was associated with twice the risk of developing diabetes.

Researchers not involved in the studies praised its robust methodology but warned it was premature for consumers to change their behaviour until more research is conducted.

Tom Sanders, a nutrition expert at King's College London, cautioned that the results could be "due to an inability to completely correct for other factors already known to contribute to risk".

For example, processed meat and alcohol are both already strongly linked to higher cancer rates.

This could mean that it was not sodium metabisulphite -- which is used in winemaking to kill yeast -- that was causing cancer, but actually drinking the wine, Sanders suggested.

But one option could be to label foods "that use nitrates/nitrites with a health warning", he added.

The studies were published days after the UK banned daytime TV, radio and online advertisements for unhealthy food and drinks that are high in fat, salt and sugar.

https://www.barrons.com/news/some-food-preservatives-linked-to-higher-cancer-diabetes-risk-e2167df7 

Thursday, 27 November 2025

Ultra-Processed Foods and Type 2 Diabetes: 3 Things to Know About Diet and Risk

From healthline.com

  • Research shows that around 70% of the food supply chain in the United States consists of ultra-processed foods.
  • A recent study shows that around one in 10 new cases of type 2 diabetes and around 3% of new cardiovascular disease cases could be linked back to sugary drinks.
  • A 2024 study found an association between eating processed red meats and an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
  • Another study from 2024 found that replacing ultra-processed foods in your diet can help reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Research published in Nature CommunicationsTrusted Source in 2023 estimates that around 70% of the food supply chain in the U.S. consists of ultra-processed foods.

While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) are working togetherTrusted Source to officially define ultra-processed foods, many other experts and agencies commonly use the definition set out by NOVA.

NOVA defines ultra-processed foods as those that contain “formulations of ingredients, mostly of exclusive industrial use, typically created by a series of industrial techniques and processes.”

Another way of thinking about ultra-processed foods is foods that contain ingredients that are generally not found in a kitchen cupboard, such as types of additives, emulsifiers, or stabilizers.

Researchers have been studying the health risks of consuming ultra-processed foods. A study published in Nutrition & Metabolism in November 2025 looked at a potential association between ultra-processed foods and prediabetes in young adults.

The researchers from the Keck School of Medicine of USC studied a group of 85 young adults ages 17 to 22 over a 4-year period. They found that an increased intake of ultra-processed foods was linked to a higher risk of prediabetes.

Yiping Li, one of the study authors, and currently a doctoral researcher in quantitative biomedical sciences at Dartmouth College, stated in a press release that: “These findings indicate that ultra-processed food consumption increases the risk for pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes among young adults—and that limiting consumption of those foods can help prevent disease.”

A study published in Nature MedicineTrusted Source in January 2025 charted the metabolic and cardiovascular complications that may be associated with sugar-sweetened beverages, like soda.

The researchers found that around one in 10 new cases of type 2 diabetes and over 3% of cardiovascular disease cases are associated with sugary drinks.

The researchers also estimated that sugary drinks were linked to 80,278 deaths from type 2 diabetes and 257,962 deaths from cardiovascular disease.

Maddie Gallivan, a registered dietitian who was not involved in the study, said that “there is really no benefit to drinking sugary drinks.”

She advised that swapping sugary drinks for healthier options can make a difference to sugar intake while also offering additional benefits like probiotics and polyphenols.

Some health swaps include:

Research published in the Lancet Diabetes & EndocrinologyTrusted Source in September 2024 found that eating red meat and processed meat can lead to a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

This research found that people who ate around 50 grams (g) of processed meat (the equivalent of 2 slices of ham) each day were at a 15% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes within the next 10 years.

Eating 100 g of unprocessed red meat (the equivalent of a small steak) every day can increase the risk by 10%.

There are various reasons these meats may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. Silvana Obici, MD, Chief of the Division of Endocrinology at Stony Brook Medicine, not involved in this study, cautioned that statistical association does not necessarily imply causation.

“Also, the cooking methods such as frying in fat/oil or charring meats at high temperature can generate by-products well known to affect glucose metabolism (e.g., advanced glycationTrusted Source end products),” she added.

Jennifer Pallian, a registered dietitian and owner of Foodess, not involved in the study, noted that there are various substitutes for red and processed meats that may help reduce your risk of type 2 diabetes.

These substitutes include plant-based proteins and fish, especially salmon, mackerel, and sardines.

                    How do ultra-processed foods affect diabetes? Here’s the latest evidence. Image credit: Maskot/Getty Images

A study published in The Lancet Regional Health: EuropeTrusted Source in November 2024 examined the relationship between the degree of food processing and type 2 diabetes risk. This included which ultra-processed foods were the highest risk.

The researchers of this study found that for every 10% increase in the amount of ultra-processed foods in your diet, your risk of type 2 diabetes increases by 17%.

However, this risk can be lowered by consuming fewer ultra-processed foods and replacing them with healthier options.

The highest risk groups of ultra-processed foods were:

  • artificially-sweetened beverages
  • savoury snacks
  • ready meals
  • animal-based products, such as processed meats.

Nichola Ludlam-Raine, a specialist dietitian and the author of How Not to Eat Ultra-Processed, who was not involved in the study, noted that “replacing UPFs with whole, minimally processed foods can help with weight management, stabilize blood sugar levels, improve insulin sensitivity, and provide more nutrients and fibre, which are protective against type 2 diabetes.”

Ludlam-Raine also stated that small swaps are the way to go. She gave the following tips for swapping ultra-processed foods for healthier options:

  • replace sugary snacks with whole fruits or nuts
  • instead of sweetened yogurt, opt for plain yogurt and add your own fruit and honey for sweetness
  • cooking from scratch is a great way to limit ultra-processed foods in your diet.

Friday, 10 October 2025

6 foods that can trigger the risk of developing type 2 diabetes

From indianexpress.com 

Friday, 25 July 2025

How ultra-processed food may fuel Type 2 diabetes

From ewg.org

Type 2 diabetes affects roughly 34 million Americans. The numbers are rising, especially among children, and ultra-processed food might be playing a role.

Americans are increasingly consuming this type of food, which can include packaged snacks, soda, instant noodles, fast food, frozen entrees and refined bread. Americans’ dietary habits for ready-to-eat foods has gone up over the past two decades, according to a 2022 study. 

On average, ultra-processed food or UPF, accounts for almost 60% of an American adult’s diet. It’s even higher for kids and teens, representing more than two-thirds of their total calories. 

The rising consumption of these foods may play a role in the increased incidence of long-term chronic diseases like cancer, heart disease, cardiovascular disease, Crohn’s disease, depression and brain disorders like dementia. 

Rising prevalence of Type 2 diabetes 

Some studies have associated increased consumption of UPF with a higher risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, one of the most widespread chronic diseases in the U.S. 

Type 2 diabetes accounts for 90% to 95% of all diabetes cases, and according to the National Institutes of Health nearly 12% of people in the U.S. of all ages have diabetes. 

With Type 2 diabetes, the body begins to lose its ability to effectively regulate blood sugar. Disruptions to the body's usual metabolic system can also lead to higher blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose levels and obesity. 

The incidence of Type 2 diabetes went up dramatically between 2002 and 2018 for all children in the U.S, especially for Black and American Indian children. 

There is a growing body of research linking UPF consumption and the risk of Type 2 diabetes, with high intake increasing the risk in one study by as much as 31%, according to a 2022 study.

In 2024, European researchers found that each 10% increase in UPF consumption in the diet was associated with a 17% higher incidence of diabetes.

This rise could mean hundreds of thousands of additional diabetes cases across the U.S.

Defining ultra-processed food

Food can be categorised by how much it has been processed – ranging from unprocessed whole food to ultra-processed. Most food products found in the grocery store are processed in some way, even if it’s just cooking or pasteurizing to make it safe and edible. 

Ultra-processed foods are different. 

They are made using one or more industrial ingredients like artificial colours and flavours, non-sugar sweeteners, and additives such as emulsifiers and thickeners. UPF is designed to be cheap, irresistibly palatable and ready to eat straight from the package. These products are engineered so we keep wanting to eat them. 

Part of what makes them so craveable is their often high levels of sugar and fat.  

Studies have shown that consumption of UPF may interfere with our brain’s reward system and the signals that tell us to stop eating. This may lead to eating more of these foods compared to minimally processed foods.

Health impacts of UPF

Studies have linked UPF consumption to metabolic diseases such as metabolicsyndrome and fatty liver disease.

UPF’s combination of high energy density and hyperpalatability promotes overconsumption. This can also contribute to weight gain. 

U.S. obesity rates have risen over the past several decades. Obesity also significantly increases the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.  

Overconsumption can increase fat storage in the body and interfere with the body’s metabolic processes. This can increase insulin production and fat storage in the liver, both of which promote Type 2 diabetes. 

Policy failures and state action 

The Food and Drug Administration is failing to protect us from harmful food chemicals, including those in UPF. Nearly 99% of food chemicals introduced since 2000 have been approved by the food and chemical industry, and not reviewed by the FDA. 

Progress on oversight for food chemicals and UPF has come largely from state governments.

California recently enacted two first-in-the-nation bans on certain food chemicals, including harmful food dyes in school food. EWG co-sponsored both of these bills. 

Other states have introduced and passed similar legislation.  

The California Senate is now considering Assembly Bill 1264  which would restrict the offering of harmful UPF in public schools. 

How to limit exposure to harmful UPF chemicals

Food choices are often driven by availability and cost. Ultra-processed foods in many categories are often cheaper than less processed foods. 

It doesn’t help that so much of what’s in the grocery store is UPF – by one estimate, as much as 70%

But, just as higher consumption of UPF can be connected to Type 2 diabetes, the reverse is also true: Replacing UPF in the diet with food that is less processed can lower the incidence of diabetes

Not all UPF are equally harmful either, and processing alone doesn’t make food unhealthy. Plain Greek yogurt, whole wheat bread and whole grain cereals are processed foods that contain nutrients like protein and fibre.

For many UPF, there’s a healthier, less-processed alternative. Instead of yogurt with added flavours, artificial colours, zero-calorie sweeteners and thickeners, you might choose a yogurt with simple ingredients: cultured milk and fruit.

The key to identifying these products is reading ingredient lists and nutrition facts. This means looking beyond marketing claims, including greenwashing. Here’s what you can do: 

Consult EWG’s free, searchable Food Scores database, which offers ratings for more than 80,000 food and beverage products based on nutrition, ingredient concerns and processing. A flag that identifies the most unhealthy UPF appears as part of the nutrition facts in the EWG Top Findings section of a product when applicable. 

Our Healthy Living app makes it easy to check what’s in products at the store.

https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2025/07/how-ultra-processed-food-may-fuel-type-2-diabetes 

Wednesday, 23 July 2025

What is Driving Type 2 Diabetes in the US?

From patientcareonline.com

Type 2 diabetes and its high and rising rates in the US are the result of a perfect storm of converging systemic, behavioural, environmental, and economic factors.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic, progressive disease marked by the body's inability to properly use insulin, a hormone essential for regulating blood glucose levels. In this metabolic condition, cells become resistant to insulin’s effects, prompting the pancreas to produce more of the hormone in an attempt to compensate. Over time, this compensatory mechanism fails, resulting in persistent hyperglycaemia. Prolonged elevation of blood sugar levels leads to systemic complications, including cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, and vision impairment.

The scope of this disease in the US is staggering. As of 2021, approximately 38.4 million Americans (~11.6% of the population) were living with diabetes, with T2D accounting for between 90% and 95% of those cases.² Of these individuals, 29.7 million were diagnosed, while an estimated 8.7 million (nearly 23%) were unaware of their condition. Prediabetes is even more prevalent: nearly 98 million US adults—over one in three—were identified as having elevated blood glucose levels that place them at increased risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes.

The US faces a perfect storm of converging systemic, behavioural, environmental, and economic factors that drive its high and rising T2D prevalence.

Overweight and Obesity

Obesity is the most significant modifiable risk factor. More than 40% of American adults meet the clinical criteria for obesity, an endocrinologic condition that directly contributes to insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction. Obesity in childhood is also rising and and poses a growing concern. Currently obesity affects nearly 20% of children and adolescents, a trend that further increases future risk of diabetes and related chronic diseases.

Sedentary Lifestyle

The lack of physical activity in the US is widespread with many contributing factors. Despite strong evidence that moderate exercise improves glucose control and reduces insulin resistance, fewer than 1 in 4 US adults meet the CDC’s physical activity guideline of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise per week. Of interest, there is a growing body of research that supports "weekend warrior" activity, where an individual reaches the weekly exercise target in just 1 or 2 sessions. Evidence has shown that even this irregular exercise pattern is associated with a 33% reduction in cardiovascular mortality and a 21% decrease in all-cause mortality among people with T2D.

Dietary Habits, Ultra-processed Food

The American diet has also evolved in ways that increase risk for T2D. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages is common, while intake of fibre-rich whole foods remains below national recommendations, according to the Department of Agriculture and Health and Human Services Agency. This dietary imbalance is particularly harmful in low-income neighbourhoods where access to fresh, healthy food options is limited. Research has consistently shown that this pattern of high-calorie, nutrient-poor intake is a potent contributor to the development of insulin resistance and progression to type 2 diabetes.

Demographics, Genetics

T2D prevalence is unevenly distributed across demographics and has genetic underpinnings as well. The likelihood of developing T2D increases with age, and the disease is more common in individuals with a family history of diabetes. Certain racial and ethnic groups, including Black, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Asian American populations, are at significantly higher risk. Remarkably, Black adults in the US are nearly 60% more likely to be diagnosed with T2D compared to white adults. Among American Indian and Alaska Native adults, the age-adjusted prevalence is 14.5%, nearly double the 7.4% seen in non-Hispanic white populations. While genetic predisposition accounts for up to 72% of heritable diabetes risk, individual gene effects are usually modest.

Social Determinants of Health, Health Care Access

Beyond individual behaviours and biological risk factors, the structure of the US health care and social safety net systems contributes to the crisis. Despite high per capita healthcare spending, many Americans lack reliable access to preventive care, nutrition counseling, diabetes education, and ongoing disease management. The economic burden is equally concerning. The average annual cost of diabetes per person is $16,750, and approximately 1 in every 4 US health care dollars is spent on diabetes-related care. The US also spends approximately $35 billion annually on insulin, yet cost-related underuse remains a barrier to glycaemic control for many people.

Although the National Diabetes Prevention Program, supported by both NIH and CDC, has demonstrated that modest weight loss and physical activity can reduce the risk of T2D by nearly 60%, the program is underutilized and also underfunded. Lack of awareness, poor reimbursement models, and logistical barriers have all hindered broader adoption, particularly in underserved communities.

The Built Environment Contributes

Research has demonstrated that environmental and urban design factors further exacerbate the issues that contribute to the escalating prevalence of T2D. Many American cities and towns are built in ways that discourage physical activity. Communities often lack sidewalks, bike lanes, or access to safe green spaces. This design limits opportunities for routine movement, which is essential for maintaining metabolic health. Additionally, growing evidence suggests that environmental pollutants, including airborne particulate matter, may increase diabetes risk, especially in urban areas with poor air quality.

When combined, all of these factors create a uniquely challenging public health landscape. While lifestyle-related contributors to T2D are well known, their impact is magnified by systemic inequities in food access, housing, education, and healthcare. These intersecting issues form a web of vulnerability that makes the US particularly susceptible to the epidemic levels of diabetes.

How to Stem the Tide

Yet the trajectory is not irreversible. Evidence-based interventions, including lifestyle modification, early screening, community-based prevention programs, and policy reforms targeting food systems and urban planning, offer powerful tools to reduce new cases and improve outcomes for those already affected. To succeed, these interventions must be accessible, equitable, and supported by systemic changes that address the root causes of diabetes, not just its symptoms.

https://www.patientcareonline.com/view/what-is-driving-type-2-diabetes-in-the-us-