Friday, 30 May 2025

Midlife weight loss may lower your long-term risk of diabetes, study finds

From news-medical.net/news 

A decades-long study reveals that shedding extra weight in midlife, without medication or surgery, could reduce your risk of serious illness and help you live longer

A recent paper published in the journal JAMA Network Open examined the benefits of sustained weight reduction in midlife, going beyond the established reduction in diabetes risk.

Introduction

Morbid obesity is treated both medically and surgically. Newer drugs, like glucagon-like peptide one receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and bariatric surgery induce significant weight loss. While these reduce chronic disease and death risks, they carry their risks.

Overweight and obese people cut their risk of diabetes mellitus when they lose weight. The change in the risk of other chronic diseases is still unclear, perhaps because of poor study design and inadequate study periods. For instance, reduced cardiovascular and total mortality after six years of lifestyle modification may only manifest three decades later.

The current study addressed healthy people between 40 and 50 (midlife) who lost weight, as measured by changes in their body mass index (BMI), without pharmacological or surgical interventions. Their risk of chronic disease and/or death was measured over several decades.

The study included 23,149 adults from three cohorts with height and weight measured over 12-35 years. These were the 1985-1988 Whitehall II study (WHII), the 1964-1973 Helsinki Businessmen Study (HBS), and the 2000 Finnish Public Sector study (FPS). 

They were classified into four groups: those with a stable BMI at <25 (persistent healthy weight), those with a BMI change from 25 or more to <25 (weight loss), BMI change from <25 to 25 or more (weight gain), and those who had a stable BMI at 25 or more (persistent overweight).

Study: Weight Loss in Midlife, Chronic Disease Incidence, and All-Cause Mortality During Extended Follow-Up. Image credit: goffkein.pro/Shutterstock.com

Study findings

Overall, overweight adults who lost enough weight to become healthy, and kept it off, had a lower risk of chronic disease. This was independent of the change in type 2 diabetes risk. They also had a lower risk of death from all causes compared with those who remained overweight.

In the WHII and HBS cohorts, BMI trajectories remained stable up to ages 66 and 80 respectively. Approximately 5% and 9% of participants, respectively, were classified as obese (BMI ≥30) at one or both early evaluations, indicating a population largely free from morbid obesity at baseline.

Compared to overweight participants, WHII participants who lost or kept within a healthy weight had a 50% lower risk of developing one or more chronic diseases over a median of 23 years of follow-up. After adjusting for the effect of decreased diabetes risk, chronic disease risk remained 40% lower. This may be partly explained by the lower mean blood pressure and total cholesterol levels among those who lost weight.

In the FPS cohort, those who lost weight had a 60% reduction in the risk of chronic disease over a median of 12 years. The HBS participants had a 20% lower risk of death over a median follow-up of 35 years. The median survivor age was 91 years at the end of the study.

Participants who gained weight from a healthy to overweight BMI also had an elevated risk of chronic disease compared to those with persistent healthy weight, though lower than those with persistent overweight.

Evidence

By choosing cohorts of healthy people with a relatively lower median age, the analysis excluded confounding due to unintentional weight loss. Unintended weight loss is often associated with frailty due to disease, old age, or cancer, so it is usually a marker of increased mortality risk.

Other studies have repeatedly demonstrated a reduced diabetes risk among people who intentionally lose weight, including those who are treated with drugs or surgery. There has not been consistent evidence of marked differences in cardiovascular risk or mortality.

This may be because medical or surgical interventions cause larger weight loss. Again, control groups may be on statins or other drugs that improve cardiovascular risk.

Moreover, healthy but overweight people have a comparable mortality risk with healthy-weight individuals. Above all, follow-up periods that are too short prevent the detection of long-term benefits to health and mortality risk.

These findings may not be generalizable to morbidly obese people, who are usually the subjects of bariatric surgery or weight loss drugs. In such people, weight loss may involve the loss of lean (muscle) mass, which could pose a risk to health over time.

The FPS cohort used self-reported BMI data, which introduces some limitations compared to the measured data used in the other studies. This study did not assess whether weight loss was intentional, though researchers inferred it likely was, based on participant age and health status.

Research in this field should attempt to cover the whole life course, since obesity or being overweight in childhood predicts a higher risk of ischemic heart disease unless the weight is normalized during adolescence.

The study did not directly assess whether weight loss was intentional. Still, because participants were free of diagnosed disease and relatively young, the authors infer that the weight loss was likely deliberate and due to lifestyle changes.

Conclusion

The study found that individuals who reduced their weight from overweight to a healthy range during midlife, without medications or surgery, experienced meaningful long-term health benefits. These included a lower risk of developing chronic diseases and, in some cases, a reduced risk of death.

The benefits persisted even when the reduced risk of diabetes was accounted for, suggesting health benefits beyond lowering diabetes risk. Although sustained weight loss through lifestyle changes can be challenging, the findings highlight its potential to improve long-term health outcomes when initiated in midlife significantly.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20250529/Midlife-weight-loss-may-lower-your-long-term-risk-of-diabetes-study-finds.aspx

Thursday, 29 May 2025

Type 1 Diabetes Patients Lose Weight on Vegan Diet Without Calorie Restrictions

From vegconomist.com

A recent secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial published in Frontiers in Nutrition examined the effects of plant-based diets on body weight among adults with type 1 diabetes. Conducted by researchers at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, the study evaluated how different categories of plant-based foods impacted weight loss compared to a portion-controlled diet.

“Our research shows that replacing animal products with plant-based foods […] benefits people with type 1 diabetes who are looking to lose weight”

The trial involved 58 adults with type 1 diabetes, randomised to either an ad libitum low-fat vegan diet or a portion-controlled, energy-restricted diet over 12 weeks. The vegan diet excluded all animal products and placed no restrictions on calorie or carbohydrate intake. The portion-controlled diet focused on caloric reduction for overweight participants and maintained consistent carbohydrate consumption.

Dietary intake was assessed using the Plant-based Dietary Index (PDI) framework, which categorizes plant foods into healthful (hPDI)—including fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, oils, coffee, and tea—and unhealthful (uPDI)—including fruit juices, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, potatoes, and sweets. Scores in these categories reflect the relative consumption of respective foods.

Participants following the vegan diet increased overall PDI and hPDI scores significantly, while their uPDI scores also rose. In contrast, the portion-controlled group showed no significant change in PDI or uPDI but experienced a modest increase in hPDI. Notably, vegan diet participants increased intake of legumes, whole grains, and fruits, but reduced consumption of vegetable oils and nuts, whereas the portion-controlled group increased whole grain intake only.

                                                                                                Image: Zuzyusa on Pixabay

Significant weight loss for vegan group

Weight loss averaged 5.2 kilograms (approximately 11 pounds) in the vegan group, with no significant weight change in the portion-controlled group. Statistical analysis showed a correlation between increases in PDI and hPDI scores and reductions in body weight, even after adjusting for changes in energy intake. No such relationship was observed for changes in uPDI.

Lead author Hana Kahleova, MD, PhD, noted: “Our research shows that replacing animal products with plant-based foods—even so-called ‘unhealthy’ ones, as defined by the plant-based diet index—benefits people with type 1 diabetes who are looking to lose weight.

“Whether you have an orange and oatmeal for breakfast or orange juice and toasted white bread, either option is a better choice for weight loss than eggs and cottage cheese.”

Previous findings from the primary trial reported that the vegan diet improved insulin sensitivity, reduced insulin requirements, enhanced glycaemic control, and improved cholesterol and kidney function in the same patient group.

The study’s design included weekly dietary counselling by registered dietitians, and participants recorded all meals via a digital tracking tool. Physical activity and medication regimens were kept stable during the intervention.

Weight loss without calorie restriction

The analysis found no association between changes in plant-based dietary indices and total energy intake, suggesting that the weight loss observed was independent of caloric restriction. Researchers pointed out that while some plant-based “unhealthful” foods did not negatively impact weight loss, consumption of vegetable oils and nuts—categorized as healthful—declined in the vegan group, which may have contributed to weight reduction.

This study adds to existing literature on diet and type 1 diabetes, demonstrating that substitution of animal products with plant foods can produce weight loss without caloric limits, irrespective of the perceived healthfulness of specific plant-based foods.

https://vegconomist.com/studies-and-numbers/type-1-diabetes-patients-lose-weight-vegan-diet-without-calorie-restrictions/ 

Top 7 Breakthroughs in Type 2 Diabetes Treatment for 2025

From diabetesincontrol.com

Type 2 diabetes management continues to evolve, and 2025 promises new hope for millions. With pharmaceutical innovations, digital health integrations, and groundbreaking clinical findings, the landscape of diabetes treatment is rapidly shifting. But which developments truly stand out?

Table of Contents

  • Personalized GLP-1 Agonists
  • Dual-Acting GIP/GLP-1 Therapies
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring Advancements
  • Digital Therapeutics and AI-Driven Apps
  • Beta Cell Regeneration Research
  • Microbiome-Based Interventions
  • Cardio-Renal Diabetes Therapies

Personalized GLP-1 Agonists

GLP-1 receptor agonists have transformed diabetes care by improving glycaemic control and promoting weight loss. In 2025, pharmaceutical companies are focusing on personalized formulations of these therapies, tailoring dosing schedules and molecular structures to individual metabolic profiles.

These developments aim to reduce gastrointestinal side effects and increase adherence. Drugs like semaglutide (Ozempic) are being reformulated with extended-release versions and alternate delivery methods, such as microneedle patches and oral capsules. This innovation enhances bioavailability and minimizes injection fatigue.

Personalized GLP-1s represent a significant leap in diabetes treatment, targeting glucose management more efficiently while aligning with patients’ unique needs.

Dual-Acting GIP/GLP-1 Therapies

Tirzepatide (Mounjaro), a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, has garnered significant attention since its FDA approval. In 2025, research has pushed further, optimizing this class for broader metabolic benefits.

These dual-action drugs not only improve insulin sensitivity but also curb appetite and support cardiovascular health. Trials suggest that combination therapies reduce A1C levels more effectively than monotherapies.

Moreover, newer versions are being tested for long-term weight management in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes. These medications are bridging the gap between diabetes and obesity care, further enhancing their impact.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Advancements

CGMs have revolutionized how patients and clinicians monitor blood glucose. In 2025, CGM devices are smaller, more accurate, and fully integrated with wearable tech.

Next-generation CGMs provide real-time glucose insights via smartwatches, notify users of trends, and suggest insulin dosing changes. Devices like Dexcom G7 and Abbott FreeStyle Libre 3 offer 14-day sensors with faster warm-up times and more intuitive mobile apps.

Incorporating CGM data into electronic health records (EHR) helps providers detect patterns and adjust therapy in real-time. This evolution reinforces the central role of technology in modern diabetes treatment.

Explore current CGM discussions at the Diabetes in Control article archive.

Digital Therapeutics and AI-Driven Apps

Behavioural interventions are critical to managing type 2 diabetes. However, scaling these interventions has long been a challenge. Enter digital therapeutics.

In 2025, AI-powered mobile apps like Virta Health and Omada Health deliver personalised coaching, meal planning, and physical activity prompts. These platforms harness machine learning to adapt to user data and provide real-time feedback.

Additionally, digital therapeutics are increasingly reimbursed by insurance, signaling a shift toward mainstream acceptance. Their integration with glucose meters and fitness trackers offers a cohesive care experience.

For a holistic approach, patients can also consult online professionals at Healthcare.pro.

Beta Cell Regeneration Research

Regenerating pancreatic beta cells could redefine type 2 diabetes care. Though early in development, regenerative therapies using stem cells and small molecules are gaining traction.

In 2025, multiple biotech firms have entered phase II clinical trials exploring the use of agents that stimulate beta cell replication. Some candidates aim to halt beta cell apoptosis, thus preserving insulin production capacity in early-stage patients.

If successful, these therapies could shift diabetes from a chronic managed condition to one with the potential for partial remission.

Microbiome-Based Interventions

The gut microbiome’s role in glucose metabolism is a hotbed of research. New findings suggest that modifying gut flora composition can improve insulin sensitivity and inflammatory responses.

In 2025, companies are developing microbiome-based capsules containing live bacteria designed to restore metabolic balance. Early trials show promise in reducing fasting glucose and inflammatory markers.

These interventions offer a non-pharmacological complement to standard diabetes treatment. Additionally, they may be especially useful in patients with gastrointestinal comorbidities.

Cardio-Renal Diabetes Therapies

Heart disease and kidney complications remain leading causes of morbidity in type 2 diabetes. Recognizing this, pharmaceutical companies are developing dual-purpose medications.

SGLT2 inhibitors like empagliflozin (Jardiance) and dapagliflozin (Farxiga) continue to demonstrate cardiovascular and renal benefits. In 2025, newer SGLT2s and dual-acting drugs combine glycemic control with organ protection.

Moreover, these medications are now integrated into treatment guidelines as first-line therapy in patients with coexisting heart failure or CKD.

Conclusion

The future of diabetes treatment is bright. As we navigate 2025, patients and providers benefit from a wider array of tools that extend beyond glycaemic control. From personalized medications and digital therapeutics to regenerative and microbiome-focused therapies, the diabetes landscape is more patient-centred and outcome-driven than ever before.

Ultimately, these breakthroughs underscore a shift toward integrated care—one that addresses not just blood sugar, but the broader health ecosystem of the person living with diabetes.

For more updates and insights, visit the Diabetes in Control article section.

FAQs

What is the biggest breakthrough in diabetes treatment for 2025?
Dual GIP/GLP-1 therapies and advanced CGMs are among the most impactful innovations this year.

Can beta cell regeneration cure type 2 diabetes?
While not a cure yet, beta cell regeneration research is progressing and may allow partial remission in the future.

Are digital therapeutics effective for diabetes care?
Yes, they provide real-time support and have shown improved outcomes in adherence and behavior change.

What role does the gut microbiome play in diabetes?
A healthy microbiome can enhance insulin sensitivity and reduce inflammation, complementing traditional therapies.

Do these treatments replace insulin?
Not all. Some therapies may reduce insulin need, especially in early-stage type 2 diabetes, but insulin remains vital for some patients.

Disclaimer

“This content is not medical advice. For any health issues, always consult a healthcare professional.”

https://www.diabetesincontrol.com/top-7-breakthroughs-in-type-2-diabetes-treatment-for-2025/ 

Wednesday, 28 May 2025

Rethinking sugar: BYU study shows food source is key to understanding diabetes risk

From news.byu.edu

'Drinking your sugar is more problematic for health than eating it'

For years, we've been told that sugar is a major culprit behind the global rise in type 2 diabetes. Now, emerging evidence from BYU researchers adds nuance to that message, suggesting not all sugar sources carry the same risk.

In the largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis of its kind, BYU researchers—in collaboration with researchers from Germany-based institutions—found that the type and source of sugar may matter far more than previously thought. Researchers analysed data from over half a million people across multiple continents, revealing a surprising twist: sugar consumed through beverages—like soda and even fruit juice—was consistently linked to a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). Meanwhile, other sugar sources showed no such link and, in some cases, were even associated with a lower risk.

“This is the first study to draw clear dose-response relationships between different sugar sources and type 2 diabetes risk,” said Karen Della Corte, lead author and BYU nutritional science professor. “It highlights why drinking your sugar—whether from soda or juice—is more problematic for health than eating it.”

                                                                                        Photo by Aaron Cornia/BYU Photo

After correcting for body mass index, excess energy intake and several other lifestyle risk factors, the researchers found the following dose-response relationships:

  • With each additional 12-oz serving of sugar-sweetened beverages (i.e., soft drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks) per day, the risk for developing T2D increased by 25%. This strong relationship showed that the increased risk began from the very first daily serving with no minimum threshold below which intake appeared to be safe.
  • With each additional 8-oz serving of fruit juice per day (i.e., 100% fruit juice, nectars and juice drinks), the risk for developing T2D increased by 5%.
  • The above risks are relative not absolute. For example, if the average person’s baseline risk of developing T2D is about 10%, four sodas a day could raise that to roughly 20%, not 100%.
  • Comparatively, 20 g/day intakes of total sucrose (table sugar) and total sugar (the sum of all naturally occurring and added sugars in the diet) showed an inverse association with T2D, hinting at a surprising protective association.

Why drinking sugar would be more problematic than eating sugar may come down to the differing metabolic effects. Sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice supply isolated sugars, leading to a greater glycaemic impact that would overwhelm and disrupt liver metabolism thereby increasing liver fat and insulin resistance.

On the other hand, dietary sugars consumed in or added to nutrient-dense foods, such as whole fruits, dairy products, or whole grains, do not cause metabolic overload in the liver. These embedded sugars elicit slower blood glucose responses due to accompanying fibre, fats, proteins and other beneficial nutrients.

Fruit juice, even with some vitamins and nutrients, is much less beneficial. Because of its high and concentrated sugar content, the researchers conclude that fruit juice is a poor substitute for whole fruits, which provide more fibre to support better blood glucose regulation.

“This study underscores the need for even more stringent recommendations for liquid sugars such as those in sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice, as they appear to harmfully associate with metabolic health," Della Corte said. "Rather than condemning all added sugars, future dietary guidelines might consider the differential effects of sugar based on its source and form."

BYU professors James LeCheminant and Dennis Della Corte, as well as students Tyler Bosler and Cole McClure, were also co-authors on the study, recently published in the journal Advances in Nutrition.

https://news.byu.edu/intellect/rethinking-sugar-byu-study-shows-food-source-is-key-to-understanding-diabetes-risk 

Early statin therapy reduces heart attack and stroke risk in diabetes patients

From news-medical.net 

Taking a statin medication is an effective, safe, and low-cost way to lower cholesterol and reduce risk of cardiovascular events. Despite clinicians recommending that many patients with diabetes take statins, nearly one-fifth of them opt to delay treatment. In a new study, researchers from Mass General Brigham found that patients who started statin therapy right away reduced the rate of heart attack and stroke by one third compared to those who chose to delay taking the medication. The results, which can help guide decision-making conversations between clinicians and their patients, are published in the Journal of the American Heart Association

I see patients with diabetes on a regular basis, and I recommend statin therapy to everyone who is eligible. Some people refuse because they want to first try lifestyle interventions or other drugs. But other interventions are not as effective at lowering cholesterol as starting statin therapy as soon as possible. Time is of the essence for your heart and brain health."

Alexander Turchin, MD, MS, senior author of the Division of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Heart attacks and strokes remain the leading cause of complications and mortality for patients with diabetes. Statin therapy reduces risk of these cardiovascular events by preventing plaque build-up in the blood vessels, which, once accumulated, prevents delivery of oxygen and essential nutrients to the heart and brain.

The researchers used an artificial intelligence method called Natural Language Processing to gather data from the electronic health records of 7,239 patients at Mass General Brigham who ultimately started statin therapy during the nearly 20-year study period. The median patient age was 55, with 51% being women, 57% white, and the median HbA1c-a measure of blood sugar-being 6.9.

Nearly one-fifth (17.7%) of the patients in the study declined statin therapy when it was first recommended by their clinicians, then later accepted the therapy (after a median of 1.5 years) upon repeated recommendation by their clinician. Of those who delayed, 8.5% had a heart attack or stroke. But for patients who started statins immediately, the rate of those cardiovascular events was just 6.4%.

"Clinicians should recognize the increased cardiovascular risk associated with delaying statin therapy for patients with diabetes and use this information to guide shared decision-making conversations with their patients," said Turchin.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20250527/Early-statin-therapy-reduces-heart-attack-and-stroke-risk-in-diabetes-patients.aspx

Tuesday, 27 May 2025

What is gestational diabetes?

From newsnationnow.com

  • Disease usually develops around 24th week of pregnancy
  • Many women with gestational diabetes have no symptoms
  • Form of diabetes may be prevented by losing excess weight

Diabetes affects the lives of tens of millions of Americans.

Gestational diabetes is part of this total but specifically affects 5% to 9% of pregnant women in America, per the CDC.


(AP Photo/LM Otero, File)


What is gestational diabetes?

As the name suggests, it is a variant of diabetes that forms in a woman during pregnancy.

Oftentimes, it develops around the 24th week of pregnancy in cases where the body is unable to produce adequate amounts of insulin to combat increased blood sugar levels.

The increased blood sugar levels are a result of hormonal changes throughout the gestation period.


What are the symptoms?

Per the Centers for Disease Controla nd Prevention, symptoms often do not appear.

If they do exist, they are generally mild and can involve urinating more frequently than usual and being thirstier than usual.

The CDC recommends that women be tested to determine if they have gestational diabetes.


How do you prevent it?

The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases recommends losing extra weight before getting pregnant if you are overweight.

Regularly being physically active before and during pregnancy can decrease the likelihood of developing gestational diabetes.

If one develops gestational diabetes, the likelihood of type 2 diabetes can be heightened, but can be somewhat curtailed by making healthy choices, per the NIDDK.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/health/what-is-gestational-diabetes/ 

Sunday, 25 May 2025

Fitness coach suggests 6 strategies to reverse diabetes naturally: Lose visceral fat to 7 hours of sleep

From hindustantimes.com

To reverse type 2 diabetes naturally, fitness coach Alwyn recommends losing 10-15 kg, maintaining a low glycaemic load diet, and few more key strategies

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease that onsets when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood. While there are several treatments available, you can also aid your medications by using natural methods to reverse it.

On May 23, fitness coach Alwyn took to his Instagram page, Fitness by Alwyn, to share 6 things one can do to reverse type 2 diabetes naturally. “More than 90 million Indians have diabetes or prediabetes. But here’s the good news: Type 2 diabetes is not a life sentence. In many cases, it can be reversed. Let’s break down the science-backed strategy to do it,” he wrote. Alwyn suggested 6 things that you can start doing right away:

1. Lose visceral fat — the root cause

According to the fitness coach, research shows that losing 10-15 kg led to diabetes remission in 86 percent of participants. “Visceral fat (especially around the liver and pancreas) drives insulin resistance,” he explained and suggested focusing on fat loss, not just blood sugar control.

Do this:

• Calorie deficit through real food

• High-protein meals (1.5 to 2g/kg body weight)

• 30-45 mins of exercise daily (strength + walking)


2. Eat for blood sugar stability, not just “less sugar”

“Forget crash diets. Aim for a low glycaemic load (GL) diet,” he explained. Here is a list of low GI foods, which Alwyn had suggested in a previous post. Low-GL meals reduce post-meal glucose spikes and improve HbA1c. 

Eat more:

• Non-starchy veggies (palak, bhindi, broccoli)

• Low-GL fruits (apple, berries, orange)

 Protein-rich foods (eggs, dals, tofu, fish, paneer)

• Good fats (nuts, seeds, avocado, ghee)

Limit:

• White rice, maida, sugar

• Fruit juices and sugary drinks

• Processed snacks and sweets


3. Walk it off, especially after meals

“Just 15 minutes of walking post-meal significantly reduces blood sugar spikes (Diabetes Care, 2013),” Alwyn cited a study. He suggested: 

Move every day:

• 8,000–10,000 steps

• Resistance training 3x/week

• 10–15 min walk after lunch and dinner


4. Manage stress + improve sleep

According to the fitness coach, “chronic stress = high cortisol = more insulin resistance”. Additionally, poor sleep means poor glucose control. 

Aim for:

• 7–8 hours of sleep

• Evening wind-down routine

• Stress reducers: breathwork, meditation, journaling, time outdoors


5. Monitor progress — don’t just guess

The fitness coach suggested tracking these three factors weekly:

• Fasting blood glucose (<100 mg/dL)

• HbA1c (<5.7%)

• Waist circumference (↓ belly fat = ↑ insulin sensitivity)

Bonus: Use a CGM (Continuous Glucose Monitor) to identify sugar-spiking foods.


6. Consider these natural aids (optional, evidence-based)

Alwyn warned that before taking aids, one should always consult their doctor and suggested consuming: 

• Berberine: natural Metformin-like effect

• Cinnamon: may improve insulin sensitivity

• Vitamin D, magnesium, omega-3s to support metabolic health

Per the fitness coach, signs of reversal include: 

• Fasting glucose <100 mg/dL

• HbA1c <5.7%

• No meds, stable sugars, high energy

Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/lifestyle/health/fitness-coach-suggests-6-strategies-to-reverse-diabetes-naturally-lose-visceral-fat-to-7-hours-of-sleep-101748082760154.html